Tuesday, March 08, 2005

Taiwan and Tangents

Feeling extremely out of contact with the current state of affairs of the world at large recently I spent a little time this evening perusing CNN, WSJ, FOXnews, and MSNBC. Once I had riffled through all the headlines bringing me up to date on the Jacko trial and Clinton’s soon to come surgery I found that the biggest commonality amidst all the outlets to be a growing concern over Taiwan/China relations. It seems that the Chinese have introduced a bill authorizing the use of military force in the event that Taiwan takes steps to formally declare their independence. The United States has come down firmly on the Taiwanese side of the matter, defending the Island Nation’s right to succession. I find myself at a crossroads when it comes to the matter and a number of intrinsic questions seem to arise. First of all, is it hypocritical of the US to support Taiwanese succession when this country itself is firmly set against the idea? Before I take this off into tangentville, I would also like to note that some people believe China to be THE military and economic force in the world today, and the US is merely still playing out the role because there hasn’t been a major conflict to re-establish the international pecking order. What would happen if conflict between Taiwan and mainland China broke out? Would the US fulfill its obligations to Taiwan? Could the US fulfill its obligations to Taiwan? I would really like to see what you think, I’ll just say, I don’t know.

As far as the question of secession goes, I’ll go ahead and state very clearly that I am a conservative idealist. I, for one, do support any place’s right to secession in the event that it determines the country is no longer satiating its needs and right to life and liberty. I think that all other internal avenues must first be exhausted, but sometimes it does become necessary to secede. That is, after all, what the American Revolution was, nothing less than secession from the British Empire. The American Civil War, as a counter example, conjures questions about the ability to follow though with internal diplomacy, but one thing to come out of the Civil War that I firmly disagree with is the abolition of the States’ right to secede. I wonder if the US is missing out on its historical grandeur by forsaking the concept of federalism and moving closer and closer to an actualization of a single Nation/State, divided into 50 counties, which simply retain the historical nomenclature of the entities they once were. Now, I by no means mean to appear reactionary, I would simply like some consideration for our current situation. Is America still the United States, or do we need to recognize how drastic of a change has been effected in that dynamic?

3 Comments:

At 3:43 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Lest you forget...a condition of statehood for the great state of TEXAS was that it be allowed to secede at any time OR it can at it's own discretion divide into five states. I think these ideals are in your DNA Taylor, thus the near reactionary stance. RTA...

Dad

 
At 10:03 PM , Blogger John said...

You do make a good point, Tay-Tay: the US has a bit of a murky record on the issue of secession.

To me, the odd part about the Taiwan situation is that "secession," by all practical means, happened over half a century ago. Heck, many of the members of the EU are closer to being a united nation (in terms of currency, language, commerce, and governance) than the ROC is to being united with the PRC.

Pragmatically, they're autonomously divided. It seems to be entirely a problem of odd semantics: China can live with Taiwan being a democracy, but it's going to invade if Taiwan dare uses the n-word. (nation... ;-)

 
At 10:50 PM , Blogger Taylor Williams said...

It's absolutely a problem of semantics. Taiwan is already its own nation in everything but title. But the issue of semantics is paramount to the point where China is threatening force if the semantics turn the way they don't want them to turn. The way I see it, it really comes down to whether or not China feels that it still has a hold on Taiwan, and if they can continue to force Taiwan into certain patterns of rhetoric, then Taiwan is not truely free, in any pure sense. My question still remains. What will the US do if Taiwan does betray the rhetoric, and China moves in, forcing the US to back up its own rhetoric?

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home